After the tragic loss of thousands of our loved ones in the
9/11 terrorist attacks, the Aviation and Transportation Security Act of 2001
was signed into law. The ATSA authorized unprecedented security measures for
virtually all forms of transportation, but primarily airports and ocean ports.
ATSA authorized two options for screening air travelers and
luggage. The first model provides screening operations managed by all-federal
personnel; the second model, the Screening Partnership Program (SPP), allows airports
the option of using qualified private contractors – under federal standards,
supervision, and oversight – instead of federal Transportation Security
Administration employees.
Members of the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure (Victor Frankenstein) are responsible for the legislation that
created the TSA (Creature) that same year.
In the decade since its creation, TSA has grown from 16,500
employees in 2001 to more than 65,000 today at a cost of nearly $57 billion. The
Creature is larger than the Departments of Labor, Energy, Education,
Housing and Urban Development combined; its mammoth Washington headquarters
alone supports “3,986 administrative personnel earning on average $103,852 per
year, plus another 9,656 administrative field staff, on top of the security
officers who actually conduct the physical screening,” according to U.S. House
Joint Majority Staff Report “A Decade Later: A Call for TSA Reform” released in
November 2011.
According to Richard Skinner, former Department of Homeland
Security Inspector General, quoted in the report, “The ability of TSA screeners
to stop prohibited items from being carried through the sterile areas of the
airports fared no better than the performance of screeners prior to September
11, 2001.”
The House claims that TSA “has struggled to manage its
massive field staff in an effective and efficient manner.”
The Government Accountability Office reported that “since
the Screening Passengers by Observation Techniques (SPOT) program’s inception,
at least 17 known terrorists have flown on 24 different occasions, passing
through security at eight SPOT airports.” Of the 2 billion airline passengers
who passed through SPOT airports between May 2004 and August 2008, about 1,100
were arrested, none of whom were arrested on terrorism charges.
I thought of our local pilot (Villager) detained by TSA (Creature) recently
while walking instead of driving from his hangar to the terminal building; and
of the open-ended security fence just past the runway at Grand Junction
Regional Airport.
In the meantime, Frankenstein realizes that the Creature is out
of control and must be restrained and reformed, as the story – er – I mean
House Report and follow up Hearings continue to unfold. “TSA’s operations are
outmoded – the primary threat is no longer hijacking, but explosives designed
to take down an aircraft….Today, TSA’s screening policies are based in
theatrics. They are typical, bureaucratic responses to failed security policies
meant to assuage the concerns of the traveling public….The agency’s primary
objectives should be setting security standards, overseeing security
performance, and analyzing intelligence, but it has become too focused on
maintaining and growing its own bureaucracy.”
In December 2010, a union president in Montana (Igor, for
you Mel Brooks fans) circulated an e-mail that read, “I have some very good
news. AFGE (American Federation of Government Employees) and TSA have agreed
that the SPP program will be abolished.”
What? Can they do that? According to the House Report, TSA “Administrator
[John] Pistole’s adoption of this standard is arbitrary and capricious and in
contravention of the law.”
When Frankenstein, the 59-member Infrastructure and
Transportation Committee, questioned Pistole about the SPP decision early last
year, he responded simply: “I examined the contractor screening program and
decided not to expand the program beyond the current 16 airports as I do not
see any clear or substantial advantage to do so at this time.”
After a long hard fight that included 22 deadline
extensions, Frankenstein was able to get The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of
2012 signed into law, which includes major reform of TSA.
But will Frankenstein’s reformed TSA really be any better or
will we simply end up with yet another, albeit different, out-of-control Creature?
I turned to CliffsNotes on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein for some insight. “Each
half competes for attention from the other and for the chance to be the ruler
of the other half. In the end, this competition reduces both…to ruins.”
Oh dear. Good thing Shelley’s is just a work of fiction. Right?
This is an excerpt from my weekly column in The Daily Sentinel published in the Sunday, April 15, 2012, edition of the newspaper.
No comments:
Post a Comment